QUESTION: “Suppose someone claimed to have a device that destroyed people’s souls, but otherwise had no discernible effect on that person. How would you evaluate such a claim? Is the claim that people have souls any more plausible? Why or why not? ”
THINGS TO KEEP ON MIND:
Evidence of critical thought
Evidence of a complete understanding of the relevant theories and concepts
Grammar, spelling and length
The answer must be 350 Words.
NO WORK CITED PAGES OR NOTHING.
ITS A FREE WRITING QUESTION SO PLEASE NO PLAIGIARISM
MUST BE AN ANSWER OF YOUR OWN.